thought: be direct through process of reason

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, message
Weight: 0.60
, challenge
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings doubt
Weight: 0.64
, good
Weight: 0.62
, think
Weight: 0.38
, remember
Weight: 0.35
, know
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be direct through process of reason 1.00
be used to process information 0.81
be defined as act power or process of think 0.80
be used to reason 0.79
requires apply process to your brain 0.77
be used to process data 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(thought, be direct through process of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to reason)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(thought, be direct through process of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to process information)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(thought, be direct through process of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(think, requires apply process to your brain)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(thought, be direct through process of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(think, be used to process information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(think, be used to process information)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(thought, be direct through process of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(think, requires apply process to your brain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(think, requires apply process to your brain)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(thought, be direct through process of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(think, be used to reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(think, be used to reason)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(thought, be direct through process of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(thought, be direct through process of reason)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(thought, be direct through process of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(thought, be direct through process of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(thought, be direct through process of reason)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(thought, be direct through process of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(thought, be direct through process of reason)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(thought, be direct through process of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(think, be used to process information)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(thought, be direct through process of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(think, be used to reason)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(thought, be direct through process of reason) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(think, requires apply process to your brain)