thriller: was very famous song

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents album
Weight: 0.63
, song
Weight: 0.60
, hit
Weight: 0.59
, video
Weight: 0.55
Siblings misery
Weight: 0.52
, flatliners
Weight: 0.46
, love song
Weight: 0.32
, beat
Weight: 0.31
, twist
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
was very famous song 1.00
was famous song 0.96
was song 0.92
is song 0.90
is best song 0.90
was famous 0.82
is famous 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(video, is song)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(thriller, was very famous song)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(video, is song)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(video, is song)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(love song, is song)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(video, is song)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(thriller, was very famous song)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(love song, is song)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(love song, is song)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(thriller, was very famous song)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(thriller, was song)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(thriller, is song)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(thriller, was song)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(thriller, is song)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(thriller, was song)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(thriller, was famous song)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(thriller, is song)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(thriller, was famous song)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(thriller, was famous song)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(thriller, is best song)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(thriller, was famous song)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(thriller, was famous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(thriller, is best song)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(thriller, is famous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(thriller, is best song)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(thriller, was famous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(thriller, was song)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(thriller, is best song)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(thriller, is famous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(thriller, was famous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(thriller, is famous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(thriller, was famous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(thriller, is song)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(thriller, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(thriller, was very famous song)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(thriller, was very famous song)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(video, is song)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(love song, is song)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(thriller, was very famous song)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(video, is song)