tide: be related to stars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, variable
Weight: 0.58
, brand
Weight: 0.55
, event
Weight: 0.54
, ocean
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tidal wave
Weight: 0.33
, wave
Weight: 0.33
, root canal
Weight: 0.32
, indian ocean
Weight: 0.32
, turn signal
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to stars 1.00
be related 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(variable, be related)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tide, be related to stars)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tide, be related to stars)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(variable, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tide, be related to stars)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(variable, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(variable, be related)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tide, be related to stars)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tide, be related to stars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tide, be related to stars)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tide, be related to stars)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tide, be related to stars)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tide, be related)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tide, be related to stars)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tide, be related)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tide, be related to stars)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tide, be related)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tide, be related to stars)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tide, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tide, be related to stars)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tide, be related to stars)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tide, be related to stars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tide, be related to stars)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tide, be related to stars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tide, be related to stars)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(variable, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(tide, be related to stars)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(variable, be related)