tiger shark: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.67
, shark
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, predator
Weight: 0.58
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, bull shark
Weight: 0.42
, great white shark
Weight: 0.41
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00
is dangerous 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(bull shark, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hammerhead shark, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tiger, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(tiger, be in danger)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tiger, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(tiger, is dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hammerhead shark, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(hammerhead shark, is dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(bull shark, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bull shark, is dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(whale shark, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tiger shark, be in danger)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tiger shark, is dangerous)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tiger shark, is dangerous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, is dangerous)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tiger shark, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tiger, be in danger)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hammerhead shark, is dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(whale shark, is dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bull shark, is dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tiger, is dangerous)