tiger: be important to nature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cat
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, lion
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.79
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, rhino
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.38
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to nature 1.00
be beneficial to nature 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tiger, be important to nature)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tiger, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cat, be important to nature)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(cat, be important to nature)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(tiger, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tiger, be important to nature)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tiger, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tiger, be important to nature)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tiger, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(tiger, be beneficial to nature)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tiger, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tiger, be beneficial to nature)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tiger, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(tiger, be beneficial to nature)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(tiger, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be beneficial to nature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tiger, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tiger, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be important to nature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tiger, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tiger, be important to nature)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, be important to nature)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tiger, be important to nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, be important to nature)