tiger: being are killed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cat
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, lion
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.79
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, rhino
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.38
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
being are killed 1.00
be are killed 0.97
is are killed 0.96
being is killed 0.96
were killed 0.92
be killed 0.88
is killed 0.88
get killed 0.88
is are killed by beings 0.87
be killed by humans 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(lion, is are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tiger, being are killed)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(lion, is killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tiger, being are killed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(lion, is are killed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(lion, is killed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lion, is are killed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lion, is killed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is are killed)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(elephant, is are killed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rhino, is killed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, is killed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(rhino, be killed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(elephant, is killed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(lion, is are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tiger, being are killed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(lion, is killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tiger, being are killed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(rhino, is are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(rhino, is are killed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(rhino, is killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(rhino, is killed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(elephant, is are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(elephant, is are killed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(bengal tiger, is killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, is killed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(rhino, be killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(rhino, be killed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(elephant, is killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(elephant, is killed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(tiger, being are killed)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tiger, is are killed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(tiger, is are killed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is are killed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tiger, is are killed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tiger, being are killed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lion, is are killed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lion, is killed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rhino, is are killed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(rhino, is killed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(elephant, is are killed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, is killed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rhino, be killed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(elephant, is killed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lion, is are killed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(tiger, being are killed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lion, is killed)