tiger: eat humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cat
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, lion
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.79
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, rhino
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.38
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat humans 1.00
eat human 0.91
help humans 0.88
be important for humans 0.88
be afraid of humans 0.87
react to humans 0.86
be dangerous to humans 0.86
react with humans 0.86
be harmful to humans 0.85
pee on humans 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(predator, be afraid of humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tiger, eat humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tiger, eat humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(predator, be afraid of humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, eat humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(predator, be afraid of humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, eat humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, react to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(predator, be afraid of humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tiger, eat humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tiger, eat humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tiger, eat humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(tiger shark, react to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, react to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tiger, eat humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(tiger, eat humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tiger, eat humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tiger, eat humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, eat humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tiger, eat humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tiger, eat humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, eat humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(predator, be afraid of humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tiger, eat humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tiger shark, react to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tiger, eat humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(predator, be afraid of humans)