tiger: had stripes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cat
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, lion
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.79
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, rhino
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.38
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
had stripes 1.00
have stripes 0.94
is stripes 0.92
have black stripes 0.92
need stripes 0.91
be orange with stripes 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, have stripes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, have stripes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bengal tiger, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, have stripes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(tiger shark, have stripes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, have stripes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tiger, had stripes)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(tiger, have stripes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(tiger, have black stripes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(tiger, be orange with stripes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tiger, have stripes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tiger, have black stripes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be orange with stripes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tiger, have stripes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tiger, have black stripes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tiger, be orange with stripes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tiger, have black stripes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tiger, be orange with stripes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tiger, have stripes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tiger, had stripes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tiger, had stripes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tiger shark, have stripes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tiger, had stripes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, have stripes)