tiger: has color white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cat
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, lion
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.79
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, rhino
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.38
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color white 1.00
has color black 0.97
has color orange 0.90
become white 0.83
have black stripes 0.81
be orange with stripes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiger, has color white)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lion, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiger, has color white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(lion, has color white)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cat, has color black)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lion, has color white)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cat, has color black)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rhino, has color white)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, has color white)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, has color black)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, has color white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(bengal tiger, has color orange)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(tiger, has color white)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lion, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(tiger, has color white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(rhino, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(rhino, has color white)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(panda bear, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(panda bear, has color black)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(panda bear, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(panda bear, has color white)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(bengal tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, has color white)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(bengal tiger, has color orange) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(bengal tiger, has color orange)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(tiger, has color white)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tiger, has color black)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(tiger, has color black)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(tiger, has color black)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color black)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tiger, has color orange)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiger, has color white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lion, has color white)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has color black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(panda bear, has color black)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rhino, has color white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(panda bear, has color white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, has color white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bengal tiger, has color orange)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lion, has color white)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(tiger, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has color black)