tiger: is big

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cat
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, lion
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.79
, elephant
Weight: 0.38
, rhino
Weight: 0.38
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.38
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is big 1.00
be bigger than lion 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is big)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(elephant, is big)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tiger, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(elephant, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(elephant, is big)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tiger, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(panda bear, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(panda bear, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tiger, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(tiger, is big)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(tiger, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(tiger, be bigger than lion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(tiger, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tiger, be bigger than lion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tiger, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(tiger, be bigger than lion)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tiger, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be bigger than lion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(tiger, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(tiger, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is big)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(tiger, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(tiger, is big)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(panda bear, is big)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(elephant, is big)