tile: is good insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.61
, surface
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.60
, texture
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings concrete
Weight: 0.35
, asphalt
Weight: 0.34
, marble
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good insulator 1.00
is insulator 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(asphalt, is good insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(asphalt, is insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(asphalt, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(asphalt, is insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(concrete, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(concrete, is good insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(asphalt, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(asphalt, is good insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(tile, is good insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(tile, is insulator)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tile, is insulator)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(tile, is insulator)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tile, is insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tile, is good insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tile, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(asphalt, is insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(concrete, is good insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tile, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(asphalt, is good insulator)