tim: is duncan good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents friend
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.54
, vietnam
Weight: 0.54
, player
Weight: 0.54
, artist
Weight: 0.53
Siblings henry david thoreau
Weight: 0.35
, paul mccartney
Weight: 0.35
, william james
Weight: 0.34
, dylan thomas
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is duncan good 1.00
is duncan 0.98
is duncan paid 0.92
be duncan underpaid 0.83
is terry 0.76
is where terry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tim, is duncan good)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tim, is duncan)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tim, is duncan)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(tim, is duncan)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(tim, is duncan paid)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tim, is duncan paid)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tim, is duncan paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(tim, be duncan underpaid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(tim, is where terry)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(tim, is terry)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tim, is terry)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tim, be duncan underpaid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tim, is terry)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(tim, be duncan underpaid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tim, is where terry)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tim, is duncan paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(tim, is where terry)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tim, is duncan)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tim, be duncan underpaid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(tim, is terry)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tim, is where terry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tim, is duncan good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tim, is duncan good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tim, is duncan good)