timber: be described as renewable source

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.64
, resource
Weight: 0.64
, raw material
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings balsa
Weight: 0.39
, lumber
Weight: 0.37
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.37
, wood
Weight: 0.36
, steel wool
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be described as renewable source 1.00
be described as renewable source of energy 0.99
be classified as renewable source 0.94
be described as source of energy 0.93
be described as source 0.89
is renewable 0.87
be classified as source 0.80
be described 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(timber, be described as renewable source)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(resource, is renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(resource, is renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wood, is renewable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(timber, be described as renewable source)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(wood, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(wood, is renewable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(timber, be described as renewable source)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(timber, be described as renewable source of energy)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(timber, be described as renewable source of energy)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(timber, be described as renewable source of energy)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(timber, be described as renewable source of energy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(timber, be described as source of energy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(timber, be described as source of energy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(timber, be classified as renewable source)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(timber, be described as source of energy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(timber, be classified as renewable source)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(timber, be classified as renewable source)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(timber, be classified as renewable source)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(timber, be described as source)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(timber, be described as source)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(timber, is renewable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(timber, be described as source)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(timber, is renewable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(timber, be described)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(timber, is renewable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(timber, be classified as source)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(timber, be described)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(timber, be described)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(timber, be classified as source)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(timber, be described as source)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(timber, be described as source of energy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(timber, be classified as source)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(timber, is renewable)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(timber, be classified as source)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(timber, be described)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(timber, be described as renewable source)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(timber, be described as renewable source)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(resource, is renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(wood, is renewable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(timber, be described as renewable source)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(resource, is renewable)