timber: is sustainable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.64
, resource
Weight: 0.64
, raw material
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings balsa
Weight: 0.39
, lumber
Weight: 0.37
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.37
, wood
Weight: 0.36
, steel wool
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is sustainable 1.00
is sustainable material 0.92
is sustainable construction 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(wood, is sustainable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(wood, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(wood, is sustainable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(timber, is sustainable)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(timber, is sustainable material)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(timber, is sustainable material)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(timber, is sustainable construction)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(timber, is sustainable material)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(timber, is sustainable construction)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(timber, is sustainable construction)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(timber, is sustainable construction)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(timber, is sustainable material)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(timber, is sustainable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(timber, is sustainable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(timber, is sustainable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wood, is sustainable)