timbuktu: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, town
Weight: 0.50
, historical site
Weight: 0.47
, part
Weight: 0.42
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.29
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.29
, new york city
Weight: 0.28
, mexico city
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00
heritage of is danger 0.83
is dangerous 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(city, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(timbuktu, be in danger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(city, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(city, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(salt lake city, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(city, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(timbuktu, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mexico city, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is dangerous)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(salt lake city, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(salt lake city, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(timbuktu, be in danger)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, is dangerous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, heritage of is danger)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(timbuktu, heritage of is danger)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(timbuktu, is dangerous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(timbuktu, is dangerous)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(timbuktu, is dangerous)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(timbuktu, heritage of is danger)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(timbuktu, heritage of is danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(timbuktu, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(city, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(salt lake city, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mexico city, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(timbuktu, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(city, is dangerous)