tin: be at landfill

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents metal
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.65
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.63
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.62
Siblings copper
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, steel wool
Weight: 0.35
, cardboard box
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at landfill 1.00
be at trash 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tin, be at landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be at trash)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tin, be at landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cardboard box, be at trash)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tin, be at landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cardboard box, be at trash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cardboard box, be at trash)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tin, be at landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be at trash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be at trash)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tin, be at landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(tin, be at landfill)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tin, be at landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tin, be at trash)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tin, be at landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tin, be at trash)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(tin, be at landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tin, be at trash)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(tin, be at landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(tin, be at trash)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(tin, be at landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tin, be at landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tin, be at landfill)

Typical implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tin, be at landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tin, be at landfill)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tin, be at landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be at trash)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tin, be at landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cardboard box, be at trash)