tin: be more reactive than lead

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents metal
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.65
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.63
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.62
Siblings copper
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.35
, steel wool
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more reactive than lead 1.00
than than 2005 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tin, be more reactive than lead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more reactive than lead)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(tin, be more reactive than lead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum, be more reactive than lead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be more reactive than lead)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(tin, be more reactive than lead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(tin, be more reactive than lead)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tin, be more reactive than lead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tin, than than 2005)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(tin, be more reactive than lead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(tin, than than 2005)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(tin, be more reactive than lead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tin, than than 2005)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(tin, be more reactive than lead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tin, than than 2005)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(tin, be more reactive than lead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tin, be more reactive than lead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tin, be more reactive than lead)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(tin, be more reactive than lead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tin, be more reactive than lead)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tin, be more reactive than lead) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more reactive than lead)