tin: have low melting point

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents metal
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.65
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.63
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.62
Siblings copper
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.35
, steel wool
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have low melting point 1.00
have high melting point 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tin, have low melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(copper, have high melting point)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tin, have low melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(aluminum oxide, have high melting point)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tin, have low melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(copper, have high melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(copper, have high melting point)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tin, have low melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(aluminum oxide, have high melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(aluminum oxide, have high melting point)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tin, have low melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(tin, have low melting point)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tin, have low melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tin, have high melting point)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tin, have low melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(tin, have high melting point)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tin, have low melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(tin, have high melting point)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tin, have low melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tin, have high melting point)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tin, have low melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tin, have low melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tin, have low melting point)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tin, have low melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tin, have low melting point)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tin, have low melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(copper, have high melting point)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tin, have low melting point) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(aluminum oxide, have high melting point)