tire: has low pressure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, equipment
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spare tire
Weight: 0.69
, tread
Weight: 0.46
, spare
Weight: 0.44
, flat tire
Weight: 0.35
, car tire
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has low pressure 1.00
has pressure 0.93
lose pressure 0.85
need air pressure 0.84
lose air pressure 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(car tire, lose pressure)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(car tire, lose air pressure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(car tire, lose pressure)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(car tire, lose pressure)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(car tire, lose air pressure)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(car tire, lose air pressure)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(tire, has low pressure)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tire, has pressure)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(tire, has pressure)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tire, has pressure)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(tire, need air pressure)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(tire, need air pressure)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tire, need air pressure)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tire, lose air pressure)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tire, has pressure)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tire, lose air pressure)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tire, lose air pressure)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tire, lose air pressure)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tire, need air pressure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tire, has low pressure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tire, has low pressure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(car tire, lose pressure)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tire, has low pressure)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(car tire, lose air pressure)