tire: need balanced

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, equipment
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spare tire
Weight: 0.69
, tread
Weight: 0.46
, spare
Weight: 0.44
, flat tire
Weight: 0.35
, car tire
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
need balanced 1.00
is balanced 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(car tire, need balanced)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(car tire, is balanced)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(car tire, is balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(car tire, is balanced)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(car tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(car tire, need balanced)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(tire, need balanced)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tire, is balanced)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tire, is balanced)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(tire, is balanced)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(tire, is balanced)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tire, need balanced)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tire, need balanced)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(car tire, is balanced)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tire, need balanced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(car tire, need balanced)