tissue: be beneficial to plants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bone
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.61
, paper towel
Weight: 0.56
, nucleic acid
Weight: 0.56
Siblings bone tissue
Weight: 0.82
, bone cell
Weight: 0.76
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.75
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.73
, muscle cell
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beneficial to plants 1.00
be important to plants 0.91
be in plants important 0.91
be important in plants 0.91
be in plants 0.88
be different in plants 0.88
be important to plant 0.85
be present in plants 0.83
survive than nonvascular plants 0.82
survive than plants 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be beneficial to plants)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be important in plants)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be important to plant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be important to plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be in plants important)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, survive than plants)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, be in plants)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(vascular tissue, survive than nonvascular plants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be beneficial to plants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be in plants important)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be in plants important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be in plants)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be in plants)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be important to plants)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be important to plants)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be important in plants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be important in plants)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(vascular tissue, survive than nonvascular plants)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, survive than nonvascular plants)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(vascular tissue, survive than plants)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, survive than plants)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(vascular tissue, be important to plant)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(vascular tissue, be important to plant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(tissue, be beneficial to plants)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tissue, be important to plants)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(tissue, be in plants important)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(tissue, be important in plants)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(tissue, be different in plants)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tissue, be in plants important)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tissue, be different in plants)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tissue, be important to plants)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tissue, be important in plants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(tissue, be different in plants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tissue, be in plants important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tissue, be important to plants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tissue, be important in plants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tissue, be important to plant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tissue, be present in plants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tissue, be present in plants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tissue, be important to plant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tissue, be present in plants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be important to plants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be important in plants)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(tissue, be important to plant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be in plants important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be important to plant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be different in plants)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be present in plants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tissue, be beneficial to plants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be in plants)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, survive than nonvascular plants)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, survive than plants)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be in plants important)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be beneficial to plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be important to plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be important in plants)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be beneficial to plants)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(vascular tissue, be important to plant)