titanic: was good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.60
, ship
Weight: 0.59
, title
Weight: 0.58
Siblings incredible hulk
Weight: 0.33
, monster
Weight: 0.32
, battleship
Weight: 0.32
, cruise ship
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good 1.00
was discovred 0.84
has quality good 0.84
was strong 0.84
was good name 0.84
was thought unsinkalble 0.82
has quality bad 0.81
was made 0.78
was difficult 0.78
is 12 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(titanic, was good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(titanic, was good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(film, was made)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(titanic, was good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(title, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(titanic, was good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(title, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(film, was made)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(film, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(title, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(film, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(movie, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(film, was made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(battleship, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(monster, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(titanic, was good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(titanic, was good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(title, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(titanic, was good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(film, was made)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(titanic, was good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(monster, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(monster, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(battleship, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(battleship, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(titanic, was good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was discovred)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(titanic, was strong)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(titanic, was discovred)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(titanic, was discovred)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(titanic, was good name)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(titanic, was strong)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(titanic, was difficult)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(titanic, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(titanic, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(titanic, was good name)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(titanic, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(titanic, was good name)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was good name)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(titanic, is 12)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(titanic, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(titanic, was strong)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(titanic, was discovred)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(titanic, was thought unsinkalble)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(titanic, is 12)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(titanic, was difficult)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(titanic, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was strong)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(titanic, is 12)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(titanic, was thought unsinkalble)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(titanic, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was made)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(titanic, was made)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(titanic, was made)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(titanic, was made)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was thought unsinkalble)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(titanic, was thought unsinkalble)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(titanic, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(titanic, was difficult)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(titanic, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was difficult)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(titanic, is 12)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(titanic, was good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(film, was made)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(title, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monster, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(battleship, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(film, was made)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(title, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(titanic, was good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)