titanium: is hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents metal
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.64
, aluminum
Weight: 0.64
, alloy
Weight: 0.63
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.38
, steel
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.36
, iron oxide
Weight: 0.35
, silicon carbide
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hard 1.00
be hard to machine 0.83
be difficult to machine 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(aluminum, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(titanium, is hard)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(metal, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(titanium, is hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(metal, is hard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aluminum, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is hard)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(metal, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(silicon carbide, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(aluminum, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(titanium, is hard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(metal, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(titanium, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(silicon carbide, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(silicon carbide, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(titanium, is hard)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(titanium, be hard to machine)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(titanium, be hard to machine)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(titanium, be hard to machine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(titanium, be difficult to machine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(titanium, be difficult to machine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be hard to machine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(titanium, be difficult to machine)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(titanium, be difficult to machine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(titanium, is hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(titanium, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(metal, is hard)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aluminum, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(silicon carbide, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(metal, is hard)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(titanium, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aluminum, is hard)