titanium: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents metal
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.64
, aluminum
Weight: 0.64
, alloy
Weight: 0.63
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.38
, steel
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.36
, iron oxide
Weight: 0.35
, silicon carbide
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
was invented 0.81
was discovered 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(heavy metal, was developed)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(titanium, was developed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(aluminum, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(titanium, was developed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(alloy, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(titanium, was developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, was developed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(alloy, was discovered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(aluminum, was discovered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(alloy, was discovered)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, was developed)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, was discovered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(heavy metal, was developed)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(titanium, was developed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(aluminum, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(titanium, was developed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(alloy, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(titanium, was developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(aluminum foil, was invented)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(titanium, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(titanium, was invented)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(titanium, was discovered)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(titanium, was invented)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(titanium, was discovered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(titanium, was discovered)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(titanium, was invented)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(titanium, was discovered)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(titanium, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(titanium, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(titanium, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(heavy metal, was developed)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(alloy, was discovered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aluminum, was discovered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(heavy metal, was developed)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(alloy, was discovered)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(titanium, was developed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aluminum, was discovered)