title: has quality question

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tag
Weight: 0.66
, part
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.59
Siblings champion
Weight: 0.71
, master
Weight: 0.64
, top
Weight: 0.63
, league
Weight: 0.63
, donkey kong
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality question 1.00
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(title, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(top, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(title, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(league, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(title, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(league, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(league, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(title, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(top, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(top, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(title, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(title, has quality question)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(title, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(title, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(title, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(title, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(title, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(title, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(title, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(title, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(title, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(title, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(title, has quality question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(title, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(title, has quality question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(title, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(top, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(title, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(league, has quality bad)