toad: croak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.64
, lizard
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.63
, character
Weight: 0.61
Siblings frog
Weight: 0.39
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.37
, crocodile
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
croak 1.00
croak at night 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(toad, croak)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, croak at night)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(toad, croak)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(frog, croak)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(toad, croak)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(frog, croak)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(frog, croak)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(toad, croak)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(tree frog, croak at night)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(tree frog, croak at night)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(toad, croak)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(toad, croak)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(toad, croak)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(toad, croak at night)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(toad, croak)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(toad, croak at night)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(toad, croak)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(toad, croak at night)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(toad, croak)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(toad, croak at night)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(toad, croak)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(toad, croak)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(toad, croak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(toad, croak)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(toad, croak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(toad, croak)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(frog, croak)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(toad, croak)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tree frog, croak at night)