toad: is frogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.64
, lizard
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.63
, character
Weight: 0.61
Siblings frog
Weight: 0.39
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.37
, crocodile
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is frogs 1.00
be different than frogs 0.95
be different from frog 0.88
eat toads 0.85
eat other toads 0.85
is amphibians 0.84
be called toad 0.81
be named toad 0.79
is reptile 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lizard, is reptile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(toad, is frogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lizard, is reptile)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lizard, is reptile)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(frog, is amphibians)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(crocodile, is reptile)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(frog, is reptile)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lizard, is reptile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(toad, is frogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(frog, is reptile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(frog, is reptile)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(crocodile, is reptile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(crocodile, is reptile)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(frog, is amphibians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(frog, is amphibians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(toad, is frogs)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(toad, be different than frogs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(toad, be different from frog)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(toad, eat other toads)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(toad, eat toads)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(toad, is amphibians)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(toad, is frogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(toad, is frogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lizard, is reptile)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(crocodile, is reptile)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(frog, is reptile)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(frog, is amphibians)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(toad, is frogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lizard, is reptile)