toast: be at back of sofa

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.62
, meal
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, food
Weight: 0.51
, recipe
Weight: 0.51
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.34
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.34
, sandwich
Weight: 0.33
, candy bar
Weight: 0.33
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at back of sofa 1.00
be lose under couch 0.83
be at bed 0.80
be at your kitchen 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(food, be at your kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(toast, be at back of sofa)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(thing, be lose under couch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(toast, be at back of sofa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(toast, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(thing, be lose under couch)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(toast, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(food, be at your kitchen)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(toast, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(thing, be lose under couch)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(toast, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(food, be at your kitchen)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(food, be at your kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(toast, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(toast, be at back of sofa)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(thing, be lose under couch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(toast, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(toast, be at back of sofa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(toast, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(toast, be at back of sofa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(toast, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(toast, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(toast, be at back of sofa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(toast, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(toast, be at back of sofa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(toast, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(thing, be lose under couch)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(toast, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(food, be at your kitchen)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(toast, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(food, be at your kitchen)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(toast, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(thing, be lose under couch)