:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(thing, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(toast, get burnt)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(food, burn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(toast, get burnt)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(food, burn)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(thing, burn)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(food, burn)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(thing, burn)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(toast, get burnt)
Similarity expansion
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(toast, is burnt)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(toast, is burnt)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(toast, is burnt)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(toast, is burnt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(toast, burn)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(toast, burn)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(toast, burn)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(toast, burn)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(toast, get burnt)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(food, burn)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(thing, burn)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(food, burn)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(toast, get burnt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(thing, burn)