tomato: be bad for arthritis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh fruit
Weight: 0.68
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, crop
Weight: 0.66
, fruit
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cherry tomato
Weight: 0.78
, petunia
Weight: 0.42
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.40
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.40
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for arthritis 1.00
be bad for gout 0.84
be bad for ulcers 0.80
be bad for kidney disease 0.79
be good for diabetics 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(tomato, be bad for arthritis)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tomato, be bad for gout)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tomato, be bad for gout)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be bad for gout)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tomato, be bad for gout)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tomato, be bad for kidney disease)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tomato, be bad for kidney disease)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tomato, be bad for ulcers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be bad for kidney disease)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(tomato, be bad for kidney disease)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be bad for ulcers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tomato, be bad for ulcers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(tomato, be bad for ulcers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be bad for arthritis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(tomato, be bad for arthritis)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tomato, be bad for arthritis)