tomato: be bad for kidneys

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh fruit
Weight: 0.68
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, crop
Weight: 0.66
, fruit
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cherry tomato
Weight: 0.78
, petunia
Weight: 0.42
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.40
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.40
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for kidneys 1.00
be bad for kidney disease 0.89
be bad for dialysis patients 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tomato, be bad for kidneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(tomato, be bad for kidneys)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(tomato, be bad for kidneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be bad for kidney disease)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(tomato, be bad for kidneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tomato, be bad for kidney disease)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(tomato, be bad for kidneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be bad for dialysis patients)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(tomato, be bad for kidneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(tomato, be bad for dialysis patients)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tomato, be bad for kidneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tomato, be bad for dialysis patients)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tomato, be bad for kidneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(tomato, be bad for kidney disease)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(tomato, be bad for kidneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tomato, be bad for kidney disease)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(tomato, be bad for kidneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tomato, be bad for dialysis patients)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(tomato, be bad for kidneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tomato, be bad for kidneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be bad for kidneys)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tomato, be bad for kidneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tomato, be bad for kidneys)