tomato: was called love apple

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh fruit
Weight: 0.68
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, crop
Weight: 0.66
, fruit
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cherry tomato
Weight: 0.78
, petunia
Weight: 0.42
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.40
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.40
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
was called love apple 1.00
be called love apples 0.91
have more seeds than apple 0.81
be called fruit 0.81
be named after fruit 0.79
be named after other fruit 0.79
is fruit 0.78
is considered as fruit 0.78
be considered fruit 0.78
is really fruits 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tomato, was called love apple)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tomato, is fruit)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be called love apples)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tomato, have more seeds than apple)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(tomato, have more seeds than apple)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(tomato, be called love apples)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tomato, is considered as fruit)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tomato, is fruit)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tomato, have more seeds than apple)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tomato, be called fruit)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tomato, be called love apples)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tomato, have more seeds than apple)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tomato, be called love apples)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(tomato, is fruit)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(tomato, be called fruit)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tomato, be called fruit)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tomato, be considered fruit)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(tomato, is considered as fruit)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be called fruit)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tomato, is really fruits)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be named after fruit)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tomato, be named after fruit)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tomato, is really fruits)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tomato, is really fruits)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tomato, is considered as fruit)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tomato, be considered fruit)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be considered fruit)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(tomato, is really fruits)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tomato, is fruit)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tomato, be considered fruit)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(tomato, be named after fruit)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tomato, is considered as fruit)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tomato, be named after fruit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tomato, was called love apple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tomato, was called love apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tomato, was called love apple)