tool: be coated with oil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be coated with oil 1.00
is coated 0.92
is coated with grease 0.88
be like oil 0.82
be affected by oil spill 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, be affected by oil spill)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tool, be coated with oil)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tool, be coated with oil)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(resource, be affected by oil spill)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tool, be coated with oil)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(resource, be affected by oil spill)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, be affected by oil spill)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(tool, be coated with oil)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tool, be coated with oil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tool, be coated with oil)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(tool, be coated with oil)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tool, be coated with oil)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tool, is coated with grease)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tool, be coated with oil)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(tool, is coated with grease)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(tool, be coated with oil)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(tool, is coated with grease)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(tool, be coated with oil)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tool, is coated with grease)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(tool, be coated with oil)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tool, be coated with oil)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tool, be coated with oil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(tool, be coated with oil)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tool, be coated with oil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tool, be coated with oil)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(resource, be affected by oil spill)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tool, be coated with oil)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(resource, be affected by oil spill)