tool: be important to engineers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to engineers 1.00
important for scientists 0.79
help scientists 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(method, important for scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tool, be important to engineers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(method, important for scientists)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(method, important for scientists)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(method, important for scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(tool, be important to engineers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tool, be important to engineers)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, help scientists)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(tool, help scientists)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, help scientists)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, help scientists)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tool, be important to engineers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tool, be important to engineers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, important for scientists)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(tool, be important to engineers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, important for scientists)