tool: be store on shelf

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
, example
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68
, compass
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be store on shelf 1.00
be at store 0.82
be at hardware store 0.78
be at desk drawer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at desk drawer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(calculator, be at desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(calculator, be at desk drawer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(tool, be store on shelf)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tool, be at store)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tool, be at hardware store)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(tool, be at hardware store)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at hardware store)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tool, be at hardware store)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tool, be at store)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tool, be at store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tool, be store on shelf)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tool, be store on shelf)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tool, be store on shelf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(calculator, be at desk drawer)