tool: be towards americans

Related concepts

Parents	method Weight: 0.65 , gift Weight: 0.62 , mechanism Weight: 0.62 , resource Weight: 0.61
Siblings	metaphor Weight: 0.71 , task force Weight: 0.69 , spreadsheet Weight: 0.69 , free software Weight: 0.69 , calculator Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be towards americans	1.00
were important to americans	0.89
were important to native americans	0.83
be important in country like india	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(resource, were important to native americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(tool, be towards americans)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(resource, be important in country like india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(tool, be towards americans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(tool, be towards americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(resource, were important to native americans)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(tool, be towards americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(resource, be important in country like india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(tool, be towards americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(resource, were important to native americans)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(tool, be towards americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(resource, be important in country like india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(resource, were important to native americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(tool, be towards americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(tool, be towards americans)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(resource, be important in country like india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(tool, be towards americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(tool, be towards americans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(tool, be towards americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(tool, be towards americans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(tool, be towards americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(tool, be towards americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(tool, be towards americans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(tool, be towards americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(tool, be towards americans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(tool, be towards americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(resource, were important to native americans)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(tool, be towards americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(resource, be important in country like india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(tool, be towards americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(resource, were important to native americans)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(tool, be towards americans) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(resource, be important in country like india)