tool: is made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is made of 1.00
is made 1.00
be made 0.98
is made for 0.97
was made 0.96
be used making 0.87
be important making 0.85
made on computer 0.75
makes work efficient 0.75
makes work easier 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(mechanism, makes work easier)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tool, is made)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mechanism, makes work easier)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, makes work easier)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculator, was made)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(calculator, is made of)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, made on computer)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(calculator, is made)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, makes work efficient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(mechanism, makes work easier)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tool, is made)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(calculator, is made)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(calculator, is made)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(calculator, is made of)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(calculator, is made of)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(calculator, was made)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(calculator, was made)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(spreadsheet, made on computer)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, made on computer)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(spreadsheet, makes work efficient)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, makes work efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(tool, is made)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tool, be made)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made for)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(tool, be made)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tool, be made)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tool, be made)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tool, be important making)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(tool, is made for)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(tool, is made for)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tool, is made for)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(tool, be important making)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tool, be important making)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tool, be important making)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tool, is made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(mechanism, makes work easier)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(calculator, is made)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(calculator, is made of)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(calculator, was made)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, made on computer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, makes work efficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(tool, is made)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(mechanism, makes work easier)