tool: is texas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is texas 1.00
texas 1.00
florida 0.82
be important to florida 0.81
illinois 0.80
ohio 0.79
indiana 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(resource, be important to florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tool, is texas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to florida)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to florida)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(calculator, texas)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(calculator, is texas)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(calculator, indiana)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calculator, ohio)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(calculator, florida)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(calculator, illinois)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(resource, be important to florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(tool, is texas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(calculator, texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(calculator, texas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(calculator, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(calculator, is texas)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(calculator, florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(calculator, florida)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(calculator, illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(calculator, illinois)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(calculator, ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(calculator, ohio)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(calculator, indiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(calculator, indiana)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(tool, is texas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tool, is texas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(resource, be important to florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(calculator, texas)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(calculator, is texas)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(calculator, ohio)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(calculator, indiana)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(calculator, florida)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(calculator, illinois)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(tool, is texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(resource, be important to florida)