:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tooth, hurt at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(molar, hurt)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tooth, hurt at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jaw, hurt)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tooth, hurt at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jaw, hurt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(jaw, hurt)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(tooth, hurt at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tooth, hurt)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(tooth, hurt at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(tooth, hurt)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tooth, hurt at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tooth, hurt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tooth, hurt at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tooth, hurt)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tooth, hurt at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(jaw, hurt)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tooth, hurt at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(molar, hurt)