toothbrush: be example of technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.61
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.59
, household appliance
Weight: 0.57
Siblings disposable razor
Weight: 0.36
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.35
, razor blade
Weight: 0.35
, dental floss
Weight: 0.35
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be example of technology 1.00
technology 0.88
is examples 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(device, is examples)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be example of technology)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(instrument, technology)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be example of technology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toothbrush, be example of technology)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(instrument, technology)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toothbrush, be example of technology)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(device, is examples)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be example of technology)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(device, is examples)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be example of technology)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(instrument, technology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(instrument, technology)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(toothbrush, be example of technology)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, be example of technology)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(device, is examples)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(toothbrush, be example of technology)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, be example of technology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toothbrush, be example of technology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(toothbrush, be example of technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(toothbrush, be example of technology)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be example of technology)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be example of technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(toothbrush, be example of technology)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be example of technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be example of technology)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(instrument, technology)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be example of technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(device, is examples)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(toothbrush, be example of technology)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(instrument, technology)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(toothbrush, be example of technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(device, is examples)