:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(topaz, is worn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(turquoise, is worn)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(topaz, is worn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(amethyst, is worn)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(topaz, is worn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(opal, is worn)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(topaz, is worn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(opal, is worn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(opal, is worn)
Salient implies Plausible
0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(topaz, is worn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(topaz, is worn)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(topaz, is worn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(topaz, is worn)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(topaz, is worn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(amethyst, is worn)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(topaz, is worn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(opal, is worn)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(topaz, is worn)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(turquoise, is worn)