topic: be important for committee to address

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.72
, issue
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.62
Siblings dark matter
Weight: 0.69
, public speaking
Weight: 0.68
, agenda
Weight: 0.68
, science fiction
Weight: 0.66
, meeting
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for committee to address 1.00
be important for committee 0.92
be necessary for meeting 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(topic, be important for committee to address) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(agenda, be necessary for meeting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(topic, be important for committee to address) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(agenda, be necessary for meeting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(agenda, be necessary for meeting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(topic, be important for committee to address) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(topic, be important for committee to address)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(topic, be important for committee to address) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(topic, be important for committee)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(topic, be important for committee to address) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(topic, be important for committee)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(topic, be important for committee to address) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(topic, be important for committee)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(topic, be important for committee to address) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(topic, be important for committee)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(topic, be important for committee to address) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(topic, be important for committee to address) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(topic, be important for committee to address)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(topic, be important for committee to address) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(topic, be important for committee to address)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(topic, be important for committee to address) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(agenda, be necessary for meeting)