topic: is best discussed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.72
, issue
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.62
Siblings dark matter
Weight: 0.69
, public speaking
Weight: 0.68
, agenda
Weight: 0.68
, science fiction
Weight: 0.66
, meeting
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best discussed 1.00
is discussed 0.96
is 148 discussion linked 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(issue, is 148 discussion linked)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(topic, is best discussed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(topic, is best discussed)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(issue, is 148 discussion linked)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(topic, is best discussed)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(issue, is 148 discussion linked)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(issue, is 148 discussion linked)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(topic, is best discussed)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(topic, is best discussed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(topic, is best discussed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(topic, is best discussed)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(topic, is best discussed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(topic, is discussed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(topic, is best discussed)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(topic, is discussed)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(topic, is best discussed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(topic, is discussed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(topic, is best discussed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(topic, is discussed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(topic, is best discussed)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(topic, is best discussed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(topic, is best discussed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(topic, is best discussed)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(topic, is best discussed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(topic, is best discussed)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(issue, is 148 discussion linked)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(topic, is best discussed)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(issue, is 148 discussion linked)