topology: be useful today

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, architecture
Weight: 0.54
, field
Weight: 0.52
Siblings daisy chain
Weight: 0.61
, loop
Weight: 0.56
, metric space
Weight: 0.53
, configuration
Weight: 0.34
, parameter
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful today 1.00
be useful 0.94
is useful 0.94
be used today 0.83
pass useful 0.79
is important to 0.77
is interesting 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(feature, is useful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(topology, be useful today)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(architecture, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(topology, be useful today)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, be useful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(topology, be useful today)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(architecture, is important to)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(topology, be useful today)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(architecture, be used today)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(topology, be useful today)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(factor, be useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(architecture, be used today)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(feature, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(architecture, is important to)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(architecture, is interesting)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be used today)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(feature, is useful)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is interesting)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(factor, be useful)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is important to)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(loop, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(parameter, pass useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(parameter, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(feature, is useful)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(topology, be useful today)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, be useful)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(topology, be useful today)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(architecture, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(topology, be useful today)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(architecture, is important to)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(topology, be useful today)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(architecture, be used today)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(topology, be useful today)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(parameter, is useful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(parameter, is useful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(loop, is useful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(loop, is useful)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(parameter, pass useful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(parameter, pass useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(topology, be useful today)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(topology, be useful)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(topology, is useful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(topology, is useful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(topology, is useful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(topology, be useful)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(topology, is useful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(topology, be useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(topology, be useful today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(architecture, be used today)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(factor, be useful)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(architecture, is important to)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(feature, is useful)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(architecture, is interesting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(parameter, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(parameter, pass useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(loop, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(factor, be useful)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(architecture, be used today)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(feature, is useful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(architecture, is important to)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(topology, be useful today)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(architecture, is interesting)