tornado: be destructive

Related concepts

Parents	storm Weight: 0.71 , catastrophe Weight: 0.64 , thing Weight: 0.63 , emergency Weight: 0.61
Siblings	hurricane Weight: 0.67 , wind Weight: 0.59 , typhoon Weight: 0.37 , twister Weight: 0.36 , cyclone Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be destructive	1.00
be very dangerous and destructive	0.94
be both destructive and majestic	0.84
be defined as most destructive atmospheric occurance know	0.81
be dangerous	0.77
causes destruction	0.76
be deadly to person	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(storm, be both destructive and majestic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(tornado, be destructive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(storm, be both destructive and majestic)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(storm, be both destructive and majestic)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(typhoon, be dangerous)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(twister, be dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(storm, be both destructive and majestic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(tornado, be destructive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(twister, be dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(twister, be dangerous)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(typhoon, be dangerous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(typhoon, be dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(tornado, be destructive)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(tornado, be very dangerous and destructive)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(tornado, be very dangerous and destructive)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(tornado, be very dangerous and destructive)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(tornado, be defined as most destructive atmospheric occurance know)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(tornado, be dangerous)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(tornado, be deadly to person)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(tornado, causes destruction)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(tornado, be deadly to person)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(tornado, be deadly to person)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(tornado, be very dangerous and destructive)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(tornado, causes destruction)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(tornado, be dangerous)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(tornado, be defined as most destructive atmospheric occurance know)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(tornado, be defined as most destructive atmospheric occurance know)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(tornado, be deadly to person)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(tornado, be dangerous)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(tornado, causes destruction)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(tornado, be dangerous)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(tornado, be defined as most destructive atmospheric occurance know)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(tornado, causes destruction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(tornado, be destructive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(tornado, be destructive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(storm, be both destructive and majestic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(twister, be dangerous)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(typhoon, be dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(tornado, be destructive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(storm, be both destructive and majestic)