touch: feel good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.61
, hit
Weight: 0.61
Siblings eye contact
Weight: 0.34
, dimension
Weight: 0.33
, touchscreen
Weight: 0.32
, aspect
Weight: 0.32
, contact
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
feel good 1.00
seem sense 0.80
has quality good 0.80
is important sense 0.79
seem memorable sense 0.77
is most important sense 0.77
is sense 0.77
is good sport 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(dimension, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(eye contact, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(dimension, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dimension, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(eye contact, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(eye contact, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(touch, feel good)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(touch, seem sense)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(touch, seem sense)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(touch, seem sense)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(touch, is sense)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(touch, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(touch, is important sense)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(touch, is sense)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(touch, is sense)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(touch, seem memorable sense)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(touch, is most important sense)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(touch, is important sense)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(touch, is good sport)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(touch, seem memorable sense)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(touch, is important sense)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(touch, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(touch, seem memorable sense)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(touch, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(touch, is most important sense)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(touch, is good sport)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(touch, is most important sense)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(touch, is good sport)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(touch, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(touch, is good sport)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(touch, is most important sense)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(touch, is important sense)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(touch, seem memorable sense)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(touch, seem sense)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(touch, is sense)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(touch, feel good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(touch, feel good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dimension, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(touch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(eye contact, has quality good)