touch: is i d bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.61
, hit
Weight: 0.61
Siblings eye contact
Weight: 0.34
, dimension
Weight: 0.33
, touchscreen
Weight: 0.32
, aspect
Weight: 0.32
, contact
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is i d bad 1.00
is i d 0.98
is i d slow 0.96
is i d disabled 0.91
is d disabled 0.81
be with beth chapman 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(touch, is i d bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(touch, is i d)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(touch, is i d)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(touch, is i d)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(touch, is i d slow)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(touch, is i d disabled)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(touch, is d disabled)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(touch, is i d slow)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(touch, is i d slow)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(touch, is i d)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(touch, is i d slow)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(touch, is d disabled)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(touch, is i d disabled)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(touch, is d disabled)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(touch, be with beth chapman)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(touch, be with beth chapman)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(touch, is d disabled)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(touch, is i d disabled)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(touch, is i d disabled)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(touch, be with beth chapman)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(touch, be with beth chapman)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(touch, is i d bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(touch, is i d bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(touch, is i d bad)