touchscreen: be responsive to fingers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents interface
Weight: 0.67
, tablet
Weight: 0.63
, feature
Weight: 0.62
, display
Weight: 0.61
, technology
Weight: 0.59
Siblings touchpad
Weight: 0.35
, ipad
Weight: 0.34
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.34
, screen
Weight: 0.33
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be responsive to fingers 1.00
work with fingers 0.84
detect fingers 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(touchpad, work with fingers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(touchpad, work with fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(touchpad, work with fingers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(touchscreen, work with fingers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(touchscreen, work with fingers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(touchscreen, detect fingers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(touchscreen, work with fingers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(touchscreen, detect fingers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(touchscreen, detect fingers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(touchscreen, detect fingers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(touchscreen, work with fingers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(touchscreen, be responsive to fingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(touchpad, work with fingers)