tourist: come to london

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents visitor
Weight: 0.60
, other people
Weight: 0.53
, site
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.50
Siblings business people
Weight: 0.32
, policeman
Weight: 0.32
, amusement park
Weight: 0.31
, young people
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
come to london 1.00
love london 0.94
come england 0.84
go england 0.83
come africa 0.81
come to uk 0.81
go to york 0.81
go spain 0.80
go dubai 0.80
go to france 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(visitor, come to uk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tourist, come to london)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(visitor, come to uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(visitor, come to uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(visitor, come to uk)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tourist, come to london)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(tourist, come to london)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(tourist, come to uk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tourist, go to france)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tourist, love london)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tourist, come to uk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tourist, go england)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tourist, go england)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tourist, go england)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tourist, love london)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tourist, come england)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(tourist, go england)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(tourist, go to france)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tourist, love london)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tourist, come england)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(tourist, come to uk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tourist, go to france)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(tourist, come england)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tourist, come to uk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(tourist, love london)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tourist, go to france)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(tourist, come england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tourist, come to london)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tourist, come to london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(visitor, come to uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(tourist, come to london)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(visitor, come to uk)