tournament: play 5v5s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.66
, competition
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.55
Siblings olympic games
Weight: 0.69
, wimbledon
Weight: 0.66
, match
Weight: 0.65
, golf
Weight: 0.59
, slam
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
play 5v5s 1.00
be played 0.86
use game 0.83
use better game 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(golf, be played)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(golf, be played)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(golf, be played)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(tournament, play 5v5s)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(tournament, be played)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tournament, use game)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tournament, be played)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tournament, use better game)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tournament, use game)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(tournament, be played)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tournament, use better game)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(tournament, use game)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(tournament, use better game)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tournament, use better game)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(tournament, use game)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tournament, be played)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tournament, play 5v5s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tournament, play 5v5s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tournament, play 5v5s)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(golf, be played)